Following on from my recent TerraMaster upgrade posts, I have been looking at the best SSDs to use in a NAS.
Due to the configuration of the TerraMaster F4-422, I was specifically looking for a 2.5-inch SATA SSD to be used on the 5th bay as a cache drive, and that is what I will focus on with this post.
However, if you have built a NAS / server with off the shelf component or have a higher spec NAS from the likes of Synology, you may have the choice to use an NVMe drive for even better performance. I will do another post for those drives later.
When it comes to servers and storage, the overall read/write throughput is not necessarily the most important, but the drive endurance and warranty.
To keep things simple, I have looked at the price of drives with a capacity of 500GB and 1TB (thereabouts) and their endurance ratings.
Best SATA SSDs for Cache & Storage
Notes:
- Pricing is taken from Amazon mid-February 2022
- Some drives have a smaller capacity, such as 480GB instead of 512GB.
- Most drives have the very similar IOPs, so I removed them from the list
- Read/Write speeds may not be 100% accurate as they change depending on capacity
What about data centre drives? Consider the Samsung PM893
Used data centre drives are frequently recommended on Reddit, and it is a good choice. For example, 1TB WD Gold doesn’t even use TBW, they just up to Petabytes Written with this one handling 1.4PBW or 1400TBW, but it costs over £250 new.
The Samsung PM893 is one semi-affordable option worth considering, it has a 3-year warranty with a 1.3 DWPD giving it a 683TBW which you can pick up for around £100 from Scan. The more expensive PM897 has a 2628 TBW but costs £150.
Highlights – The best consumer SSDs for cache
Basically, you get what you pay for.
Probably the best choice overall is the 500GB WD Red SA500 with 350TBW endurance at a surprisingly attractive £62. The 1TB model is more than twice the price so much less appealing than the are the Kingston KC600 and Samsung 870 EVO.
Preview | Product | Rating | Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Red 500 GB NAS SSD 2.5 Inch SATA |
£42.94 |
Buy on Amazon |
At the time of writing, the Samsung 870 EVO drives are more attractively priced vs Kingston. As always, Amazon prices vary a lot, and the Kingston drives have been cheaper.
The Samsung 870 EVO is, therefore, the best 1TB with its 600TBW and priced under £100
Preview | Product | Rating | Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA 2.5" Internal Solid State Drive... |
£61.00 |
Buy on Amazon |
If those are too expensive, the WD Blue SSD is perhaps the stand out option for the affordable drives. You get 200TB/400TB TBW endurance and a 5-year warranty. Under £50 for 500GB is a bit of a bargain with that spec.
Preview | Product | Rating | Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Western Digital WDS500G2B0A WD Blue 3D NAND Internal SSD 2.5... | 54,048 Reviews |
£40.31 |
Buy on Amazon |
The dark horse is the Lexar NS100, it costs a touch more than the WB, and the warranty is less, but the TBW endurance is 20% higher.
Preview | Product | Rating | Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lexar NS100 2.5” SATA III (6Gb/s) 480GB Solid-State Drive | £54.95 | Buy on Amazon |
Options to avoid are the PNY and SanDisk. These do not state a TBW and only have a 3-year warranty. They will be perfectly suitable for normal SSD drives and light usage but best avoided for things like a cache which will have high read/writes.
SATA SSDs Comparison Table
SSD | 500GB / 1TB Price | Read/Write | TBW Endurance | Warranty |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KC600 | £70/£120 | 550MB/s read 520MB/s write | 512GB — 300TB 1024GB — 600TB | 5 |
Kingston A400 | £41 / £81 | 500MB/s read 450MB/s write | 480GB: 160TB 960GB: 300TB | 3 |
Crucial MX500 | £47 / £75 | 560MB/s read 510MB/s write | 512GB — 180TB 1024GB — 360TB | 5 |
Crucial BX500 | £38 / £65 | 540MB/s read 500MB/s write | 480GB — 120TB 1000GB — 360TB | 3 |
Samsung SSD 870 EVO | £63 / £97 | 560MB/s read 530 MB/s | 512GB — 300TB 1024GB — 600TB | 5 |
Samsung 870 QVO | NA / £84 | 560MB/s read 530 MB/s | 1024GB — 360TB | 3 |
Western Digital WD Blue | £47 / £83 | 560MB/s read 530 MB/s | 500GB — 200TB 1000GB — 400TB | 5 |
WD Red SA500 | £62 / £135 | 560MB/s read 530 MB/s | 512GB — 350TB 1024GB — 600TB | 5 |
Integral V Series 2 | £37 / £78 | 520MB/s read 470 MB/s | 480GB: 160TB 960GB: 300TB 1TB: 320TB | 3 |
PNY CS900 | £48 / £72 | 550MB/s read 500MB/s write | Not stated | 3 |
SanDisk SSD PLUS | £56 / £86 | 540MB/s read 450MB/s write | Not stated | 3 |
Lexar NS100 | £52 / £95 | 550MB/s read | 512GB — 240TB 1000GB — 480TB | 3 |
I am a UK tech blogger and have been in the industry for over ten years now, running Mighty Gadget and its sister sites and contributing to other sites around the web. I am passionate about all tech, including computers/networking, mobile, wearables, and smart homes. I am also a fitness fanatic, being both a keen runner and cyclist, so I cover as much fitness tech as possible.
Last update on 2023-09-17 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
Ross Alex
Friday 27th of January 2023
Kingston A400/SA400 is a peace of crap. I have one! It has a very small write speed after write cache is overloaded. It's only 20Mbps, and it's slower than HDD.